<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the death of the cd is greatly exaggerated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rojisan.com/blog/2003/09/the-death-of-the-cd-is-greatly-exaggerated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rojisan.com/blog/2003/09/the-death-of-the-cd-is-greatly-exaggerated/</link>
	<description>This site is currently broken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 06:47:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://rojisan.com/blog/2003/09/the-death-of-the-cd-is-greatly-exaggerated/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2003 14:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rojisan.com/blog/2003/09/the-death-of-the-cd-is-greatly-exaggerated/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>I totally agree the CD will live for a VERY long time.  As you say, it&#039;s pretty perfect for it&#039;s primary use, distributing recorded music.  The album format works out very well.  I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a coincidence that whether you&#039;re looking at the Rennaissance or you&#039;re looking at the latest top 40, that a typical &quot;unit&quot; of music fits nicely on a CD.

However, I do look forward to the demise of DVD&#039;s.  That technology was released basically as soon as it got &quot;good enough&quot;.  Dual-layer has taken it a little further, but MPEG2 has GOT to go.  It worked fine on the old 520-line NTSC screens (or larger if you paid enough bucks for a really good line doubler/tripler/quadrupler).  But with universal HDTV around the corner, it&#039;s time to make some progress on storage formats and take advantage of some of the latest, much-superior-to-MPEG2 video compression formats.  Image how good a movie could look compressed with
high-end MPEG4 and stored on a 20Gb (or greater!) storage unit.

It&#039;s a little ironic, isn&#039;t it, that the first mainstream digital storage unit is positioned to last decades into the future, while the most recent digital storage unit is already looking a little crumbly around the edges?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree the CD will live for a VERY long time.  As you say, it&#8217;s pretty perfect for it&#8217;s primary use, distributing recorded music.  The album format works out very well.  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a coincidence that whether you&#8217;re looking at the Rennaissance or you&#8217;re looking at the latest top 40, that a typical &#8220;unit&#8221; of music fits nicely on a CD.</p>
<p>However, I do look forward to the demise of DVD&#8217;s.  That technology was released basically as soon as it got &#8220;good enough&#8221;.  Dual-layer has taken it a little further, but MPEG2 has GOT to go.  It worked fine on the old 520-line NTSC screens (or larger if you paid enough bucks for a really good line doubler/tripler/quadrupler).  But with universal HDTV around the corner, it&#8217;s time to make some progress on storage formats and take advantage of some of the latest, much-superior-to-MPEG2 video compression formats.  Image how good a movie could look compressed with<br />
high-end MPEG4 and stored on a 20Gb (or greater!) storage unit.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a little ironic, isn&#8217;t it, that the first mainstream digital storage unit is positioned to last decades into the future, while the most recent digital storage unit is already looking a little crumbly around the edges?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.207 seconds -->

