defending warrantless search
so my attorney general had a few things to say today, among them this gem:
Gonzales defends wiretaps amid protest [cnn, 2006.01.24]“As far as I’m concerned, we have briefed the Congress,” he [Gonzales] said. “They’re aware of the scope of the program.”
the best explanation the administration can cook up to explain why the fourth amendment only applies when it’s convenient is “we told you we were doing it, so it’s ok”?
which might, in classic political rhetoric be interpreted as “i’m going to go home and beat my wife now.”
oddly enough, some constitutionally-aware people had something to say back…
[image from cnn]
