meta-roj

This site is currently broken

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

considering the lack of veto

an interesting statement that floated into my brain…

Bush doesn’t veto bills because in his view, he doesn’t have to; he can simply ignore the ones he doesn’t like.

congress makes laws, but they only apply to the executive branch when they are convenient. and i only get access to the courts if i’m not designated an unlawful combatant or shipped offshore to a camp. from the “conservative” party, no less. i’m sure the people that wrote the constitution felt that it was more of a guideline than a rule.

posted by roj at 8:34 am