since i haven’t been blogging much of late (life intrudes and all that…), with the exception of the memorial pages, i thought i should take the few extra moments necessary to make them more useful. memorial pages will include links to wikipedia where articles are available.
Thursday, February 10, 2005
Wednesday, February 9, 2005
Wednesday, February 9, 2005
Wednesday, February 9, 2005
Friday, February 4, 2005
Friday, February 4, 2005
Thursday, February 3, 2005
Thursday, February 3, 2005
planting softballs for the president
White House-friendly reporter under scrutiny [boston globe, february 2, 2005]The Bush administration has provided White House media credentials to a man who has virtually no journalistic background, asks softball questions to the president and his spokesman in the midst of contentious news conferences, and routinely reprints long passages verbatim from official press releases as original news articles on his website.
…
Now, the question of how Gannon gets into White House press conferences is coming under intense scrutiny from critics who contend that Gannon is not a journalist but rather a White House tool to soften media coverage of Bush. The issue was raised by a media watchdog group and picked up by Internet bloggers, who linked Gannon’s presence in White House briefings to recent controversies over whether the administration manipulates the flow of information to the public.
i, of course, have missed the bloggers simmering on this story, but, now that it’s made the boston globe, it’s probably worth mentioning (add my blog to the fire). at the moment, technorati is reporting 362 links from 272 sources. so, as one measure of the blogosphere’s ability to influence mainstream media, less than 300 bloggers can drive a story into the boston globe (it’s actually much less, since several dozen of the posts appear after the globe article).
oddly enough, you can find a citation for talon news (gannon’s mouthpiece), even here on the meta-roj blog. back in july, i wrote about the ketchup wars, and left it in the humor category. now, i’ll be the first to say that i hope the whitehouse would credential anyone that’s not a threat. that is, oddly enough in this time of perpetual war, part of the first amendment.
sadly, i’m not surprised that gannon gets called on a lot, particularly when the official white house mouthpiece or the president gets uncomfortable questions.
Thursday, February 3, 2005
stupid humans
rather than write this up myself, i dropped it into someone else’s brain, and watched while a blog post came out. so, in this case, i guess i’m proxy-blogging through my favorite welsh-promoting briton.
Remove brain before opening wallet
update: i was dreaming when i wrote this. i fixed the language.
Wednesday, February 2, 2005
no legitimate penological interest to ban victoria’s secret
in a minor landmark ruling, the 9th circuit court of appeals upheld a lower court ruling that stemmed from the washington state department of corrections banning bulk mail to prisoners.
Guess Who WANTS Junk Mail? [reuters, february 2, 2005]The “ban on non-subscription bulk mail and catalogs is not rationally related to a legitimate penological interest and is therefore unconstitutional,” he [Judge Arthur Alarcon] added.
so, it’s official. victoria’s secret and frederick’s of hollywood are ok in prison.
given the size of the american prison economy, it’s very important that marketing messages have access to this segment of the population.
besides, prisoners need more two-dimensional women.