meta-roj

monument

it appears that in some places in america, people can’t handle flags.

best wishes, eric hamlin. even middle school students need to know we live on a planet full of countries.

don’t pray where someone might notice. it scares people

no arrest made, so this is merely a cautionary tale.

‘we will not be silent” is interpreted as a threat

no arrest made, so this is merely a cautionary tale.

in dc, portable videogames are a threat.

no arrest made, so this is merely a cautionary tale.

(and this time, i mean it)

it’s hard to find on the news so far today, but the ruling itself (in ACLU v. NSA) is available here [pdf]

XI. Conclusion

For all of the reasons outlined above, this court is constrained to grant to Plaintiffs the Partial
Summary Judgment requested, and holds that the TSP violates the APA; the Separation of Powers
doctrine; the First and Fourth Amendments of the United States Constitution; and the statutory law.
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the final claim of data-mining is granted, because litigation
of that claim would require violation of Defendants’ state secrets privilege.

The Permanent Injunction of the TSP requested by Plaintiffs is granted inasmuch as each of
the factors required to be met to sustain such an injunction have undisputedly been met.59 The
irreparable injury necessary to warrant injunctive relief is clear, as the First and Fourth Amendment
rights of Plaintiffs are violated by the TSP. See Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U.S. 479 (1965). The
irreparable injury conversely sustained by Defendants under this injunction may be rectified by
compliance with our Constitution and/or statutory law, as amended if necessary. Plaintiffs have
prevailed, and the public interest is clear, in this matter. It is the upholding of our Constitution.

As Justice Warren wrote in U.S. v. Robel, 389 U.S. 258 (1967):

Implicit in the term ‘national defense’ is the notion of defending
those values and ideas which set this Nation apart. . . . It would
indeed be ironic if, in the name of national defense, we would
sanction the subversion of . . . those liberties . . . which makes the
defense of the Nation worthwhile. Id. at 264.

i was cruising around looking for this function, and couldn’t find it quickly, so i have to assume that if it does exist, it’s buried somewhere.

i’m looking for a thunderbird extension that will add a button to the message-composition window that will send the message at a specified date/time (and, if we’re feeling really fancy, add some conditions to the sending).

it’s a simple thing. where’s my h4x0rz at?

(it looks like the closest fit – sendtools – doesn’t work with versions post 1.0)

it’s never been this easy before.

(and it’s for the global fund for women, and it can be tax-deductable if you do it right).

with war building in the middle east once again, it’s time to discuss president bush’s new policy on war-fighting technology. bush has abandoned science that will destroy life, and in this perpetual war on terror, which is, as we are often reminded, all about keeping us safer (meaning “save our lives”), the united states just isn’t going to spend the money any more.

Bush Says He’d Veto Bill Easing Stem Cell Fund Limits [bloomberg, 2006.05.20]

“I have made very clear to the Congress that the use of taxpayer money to promote science that destroys life in order to save life, I am against that,”

this is not a new policy, in fact, it’s been in place at least a year –

Fact Sheet: Valuing Life Through Embryo Adoption and Ethical Stem Cell Research [white house, 2005.05.24]

Taxpayer Money Should Not Promote Research That Destroys Life.

even better, there’s evidence to support this interpretation of this quote from defensetech.org.