meta-roj

This site is currently broken

Wednesday, December 10, 2003

ts peter

in case anyone was keeping track, that’s two tropical storms in december this year.

posted by roj at 4:49 am  

Wednesday, December 10, 2003

the second half of music 2.0

day two didn’t generate much news that i could find, so that leaves me without much to say…

it was supposed to be “the download on downloads” and “the future of radio” with a dash of “taming the peer-to-peer beast” and “remixing the home.”

maybe i’ll find some good diggable quotes later…

the 20-million-downloads number from apple on day one did get picked up in a few [mostly mac] places (1, 2, 3, 4, 5).

just remember, that’s not 20 million sales, it’s 20 million tracks 🙂

posted by roj at 3:48 am  

Wednesday, December 10, 2003

a few words from harry belafonte

you can read a lot more words, i picked a few.

What’s wrong with criticism? What’s wrong with the voice of dissent? What’s wrong with another point of view? That’s what America is built on. And I want to tell you something — the minute we lose that right and that capacity to do that, we’ve lost our soul as a nation.

So now that so much exists that has filled this world with such villainy and such frustration, and in so many places, such hopelessness, people look to the place that articulates, at least out of its tradition, America articulated the hope that the future could be about.

So when George Bush gets on television yet again– with so much frequency, incidentally– and he speaks about this nation rallying to saving itself from the jaws of this fearful force that’s out there that have us caught up in this great war, people around the world don’t know quite what we’re talking about.

And I think America has to wake up to the fact that we’re sitting in a period when if we are prepared to let our rights be co-opted, as Ashcroft and others are constantly putting on the table, when you look at whom they’re putting up for selection in the courts of America, and what they’re saying would be the people who mete out the justice to our citizens, you will understand the extent to which we are in trouble and how much like the ’50’s this is.

This century, we simply don’t have room for war. And there are always alternatives. Even the Soviet Union and the South African apartheid regime were overthrown without shots being fired.

day-o!

posted by roj at 3:36 am  

Wednesday, December 10, 2003

10,000 what?

today, the dow stuck its nose above 10,000…. and the nikkei broke below 10,000.

points, ladies and gentlemen. it’s just a number.

posted by roj at 3:12 am  

Wednesday, December 10, 2003

more late adopters

rob has some interesting company – while channel-surfing, i just learned that neither larry king nor oprah winfrey have cell phones.

i guess rob is cooler than he thought 🙂

posted by roj at 3:02 am  

Wednesday, December 10, 2003

the riaa orders jackboots

slashdot points to fox, but you can get more here (zdnet), here (washington post), here (variety) and here (seattle post intelligencer).

no word on whether bradley buckles brigs no-knock warrants and usa patriot-backed secret searches with him to his new employer.

life just got interesting for all the computerless elderly music pirates.

posted by roj at 2:40 am  

Tuesday, December 9, 2003

the mice are revolting

[via boingboing]

following this crack and that crack comes the save disney site.

posted by roj at 7:35 am  

Tuesday, December 9, 2003

coke tunes?

yeah, everyone wants a piece of this action.

just minutes after i shared the [old] news about virgin (is the cola still available anywhere?), coke is getting into it too. (from the guardian).

what does coke have to offer that virgin, hp, microsoft, apple itunes, buymusic, musicmatch, napster 2, musicnet, rhapsody, walmart, echo and cnet don’t? it’s not the fizzy sugar water, it’s the brand, baby!

launch is january, with 250,000 tracks.

because when i think coke, i think… music.

13. and i know i’m missing some…

posted by roj at 2:21 am  

Tuesday, December 9, 2003

virgin joins the rumble

news.com had it a while ago.

anyone still keeping count?

virgin, hp, microsoft, apple itunes, buymusic, musicmatch, napster 2, musicnet, rhapsody, walmart, echo (maybe) and cnet/mp3.com. ding. 12 so far that i’ve noticed.

posted by roj at 1:14 am  

Tuesday, December 9, 2003

the first half of music 2.0

well, despite being passed over for a keynote (that burden being borne by sean ryan of real networks, peter lowe of apple and wayne rosso of optisoft sl), i thought i’d throw a couple cents in the direction of the big industry hoe-down and love fest going on in los angeles.

as a victim of my own philosophy, of course, most of the important answers can be found right here.

(nobody brought a hecklebot….)

the day one agenda includes panels (well, they’re calling themselves “supersession panels”) with great titles like “rip! burn! sue!” and “reinventing the music industry” – then there are the lesser sessions on “what college students and consumers really think about music,” “the battle for consumers: can it be won?” “digital marketing strategies for music”, “the next wave for audio electronics,” and “wireless and mobile music: success stories for new revenue streams”

the agenda doesn’t tell the whole story, and since i didn’t attend, i have to rely on other sources. i found two media reports, one from news.com and another on the ap wire that give some hints. i can only really speculate about the good stuff. so, let the speculation begin.

no surprise, really, that some focus was directed at the 99-cent phenomenon.

Speaking at the iHollywood Forum’s Music 2.0 conference in Los Angeles Monday, executives on both sides focused on the 99-cent price tag that has become the market’s standard for downloadable music.

also no surprise that the people who own the back catalog and are under obligation to preserve the value of the back catalog are feeling some pain at the 99-cent level while others think that 99 cents is too high to reach the mass market.

Critics say that that price needs to come down if mainstream consumers are to start buying in large numbers, making the Internet a serious factor in the record industry’s bottom line. Record labels say they can’t afford to go lower.

“There’s very little money in this to begin with,” said David Ring, vice president of Universal Music Group’s eLabs division. “A lot of people are already recognizing that we’re going to have to sell a lot more singles at 99 cents in order for us to make money, and for artists to be able to make a living.”

another hint is in the language. sean ryan (vp of the realone music division, which is rhapsody) had this to contribute…

“That’s where people want to consume, in their stereo, in their home theater system and eventually in their car and cell phone as well,” Ryan said.

which could be evidence that the people on the tech side don’t appreciate where the value is created. it may take some time for the clue to sink in that people aren’t just ears to dump music into… or wallets to extract dollars from.

the bright side, at least for the players involved at this level, is that tech and music are in bed together, to some degree, and people are generally impressed with the itunes volume (which is good, considering the itunes economics – don’t worry, they lose money on each sale, but they make up for it in ipods).

Apple Computer said Monday that it has now sold more than 20 million songs in fewer than seven months through its iTunes song store.

peter lowe of apple also shared this little bit:

Apple director of marketing Peter Lowe said that 45 percent of songs downloaded through iTunes had been sold as part of a full album, rather than in single song form. That indicates many people are still interested in purchasing large numbers of songs, or full albums, despite having a la carte options, Lowe said.

interesting number, but i guess it’s my duty to take it to the next level. if 45% of songs are sold in album format, and there are 12 songs per album (i just made that number up), then that means 9 million tracks were sold as albums, which is 750,000 albums, versus 11 million singles. so with 11,750,000 sales made, a little under 6.5% of sales are albums. given some previous numbers, this is a dramatic reversal from about 91.5% of sales in album format. just the fact that the number was presented the way it was suggests that the industry is clinging to the album – apple giving some comfort to the labels with a nice big percentage as opposed to the alternative. that can’t last – it’s about the singles (you can see my version of this here).

The Macintosh audience may not be representative of the larger market, however, since Apple buyers tend to have higher incomes and greater technological sophistication than the PC audience as a whole, and have previously had less access to the free file-swapping services.

yes, there could be a big difference between the apple market and the walmart market.

“I don’t think we can look at the old models of how we made money in the past and say we can duplicate them in the new world, that’s not going to work,” said Courtney Holt, head of new media and strategic marketing at Interscope A&M Geffen Records.

indeed…

“More players are coming into the marketplace,” said David Ring, vice president of business development at Universal Music Group. “But we still have kinks to work out. We don’t have all the artists there, and usually, almost in every case, it’s an artist issue, not a record label issue or a publisher issue.”

whoups. did someone just blame the artists?

posted by roj at 1:01 am  
« Previous PageNext Page »

Powered by WordPress