meta-roj

This site is currently broken

Friday, April 22, 2005

middle-east heroes

i’m not a comic kinda guy, but i am a culture kinda guy. so a comic of a different culture is worth a few words. now that they’ve been around for a little while, i’ll give them a pointer: ak comics.

posted by roj at 11:23 am  

Friday, April 22, 2005

revenue models for music videos

back at the end of january/beginning of february, i stumbled into two pieces on how the music business was flopping around trying to find some new models to survive on. this was about music video distribution.

i don’t want to get too far into the history of the music video, but i will say that generally speaking, the music video has been viewed as an advertisement for the album, much like the tour was to “support the album.” the album, of course, being the unit that matters for the record company, since their revenue structure is, historically at least, built on album sales. the current trouble probably has something to do with the death of the album.

in any case, it’s obvious that the record companies need to find new revenue models, and they’re willing to try anything.

universal and warner have realized that the music video is a product unto itself, and as such can be sold (or, rather, monetized):

Universal Music Charging Video Nets to Air Artists [ny post, february 1, 2005 – now locked up behind a pay-per-view model itself, and certainly not worth $3.95]

Universal’s new policy is believed to be the first in which a record company has decided to charge per video for every service that exists.

MSN is the first to sign on under Universal’s new policy. Universal’s existing deals will remain in place and be renegotiated later.

then there’s warner…

Unlimited basic video clips are included, however, premium content such as music videos and 3D games are available for an additional fee, including WMG music videos for $3.99 per music video.

posted by roj at 10:15 am  

Friday, April 22, 2005

combinatorial problems

many, many years ago, i spent a good deal of my life trying to solve some really brutal combinatorial problems with every widget i could find in the geek arsenal – i hacked on trees and heuristics and neural networks and genetic algorithms and all kinds of strange combinations thereof to coax optimizations out of personal computers.

this was an affort to improve on human optimization of really large combinatorial problems, and do it interactively, so the “human intuition” could augment “brute force” (and vice-versa) to push the solution closer to a true optimization rather than letting it get stuck in a “local optimization.”

during this time, i ran into the amd 286zx and 286lx processors (i think that’s right), which were essentially systems-on-a-chip. these are now so ancient that they don’t even show up on amd’s site anymore. anyway i had some crazy idea about packing a whole stack of these little 10mhz parts into a desktop-sized box with a 386 playing arbiter and doing user-interface duty. i figured that asymetric multiprocessing would be an interesting approach to the problem, where some small piece of the problem was assigned to one of the “slave cpu’s” which would be allowed to grind away on it until the “master cpu” (perhaps prompted by the user) decided that it was spinning its wheels, killed it and gave it a new subproblem to chew on for a while. i figured i’d start with the 286zx’s since they were available, but could slip in any sort of optimized slave processor as it came along (say, chunk of silicon design specifically to run neural network simulations or whatever). it was fun to think about.

ultimately, though, i ran out of money and ideas and patience and never quite got to a functional solution (and couldn’t afford to build custom hardware).

i bring this up now, because it sounded errily familiar when i stumbled into this news release from cornell.

Mostly their approach is to have the computer do what a human being might do: stop, go back and start over and try something different.

these people are definitely smarter than i am, but it’s neat to see it crop up again.

one tip for the cornell team: it’s possible to get some really, really neat visualizations out of these problems, and if you tweak them a bit you can get some wicked user-interaction experiences.

i bet current graphics processors would be really good at this stuff – both the visualization and the actual problem-solving. a lot better than the 286zx’s, anyway…

posted by roj at 10:15 am  

Friday, April 22, 2005

sam’s google?

wired has an interesting little piece on

It turns out that Wal-Mart, the world’s most profitable retailer, and Google, the virtual world’s most profitable search seller, have a lot more in common than you might think.

i’ve had a few things to say about the dark side of google… and i’ve had few things to say about walmart too. and that doesn’t even count the flood of walmart job applicants coming from google. i had a few clues, but i never put the pieces together…

now, i guess this means i should think about it. maybe.

nah, it’s easier to just buy a gallon of pickles.

posted by roj at 9:39 am  

Friday, April 22, 2005

nina paley and sita sings the blues

it’s making the rounds, but i figured i should throw a few words on the pyre myself anyway….

sita sings the blues

the ideal woman, in classic orchestral blues.

posted by roj at 12:00 am  

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Saunders Mac Lane

math

posted by roj at 9:38 pm  

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Niels-Henning Oersted Pedersen

nhop

posted by roj at 10:31 am  

Tuesday, April 19, 2005

funding the brainz

i’ve been off-and-on with robert for i guess years now, and tonight i got an important message… musicbrainz is looking for some bootstrapping money. This, of course, means that I need to direct your attention there, which is here.

so, please step up. i’ve done the quick homework for you, both the irs and guidestar have the metabrainz foundation, inc. listed as a charity (with not much data, considering it’s a new entity), so i’ll go ahead and vouch for robert and his work.

right now, it looks like musicbrainz is tracking some 250,000 albums from just a bit more than 150,000 artists (and that ratio says a lot). if you’re not familiar with what musicbrainz does, a quick visit here will get you clued-in.

i’m going to say that robert kaye is good people. he’s assembled a bunch of good people (including this one and this one) to keep this project doing good things. and, finally, this is important for the future of music, particularly for the independent, small-scale musician i love so much.

[ listening to songbomb ]

posted by roj at 4:08 am  

Monday, April 18, 2005

Laura Canales

tejano

posted by roj at 10:22 pm  

Monday, April 18, 2005

Salvador Camarata

sunset sound

posted by roj at 10:20 pm  
« Previous PageNext Page »

Powered by WordPress